Swedish FM Attacks Signatories of Humanitarian Initiative: ”Not Serious States”

Human Wrongs Watch

The Swedish Foreign Minister (and former Prime Minister) Carl Bildt has found himself in hot water after his curious comments on a radio show in response to questions over Sweden’s refusal to recognize the humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons at the committee of state parties to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty this past April (NPT PrepCom), the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICANreports*.

Source: International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN.

Source: International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN).

The Swedish government has been criticized for neglecting to join 80 other countries – including its Scandinavian neighbours Norway, Denmark and Iceland – in signing a joint statement put forth by South Africa which recognized and called for an increased focus on the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of nuclear weapons in nuclear disarmament discussions.

In an impromptu call to a morning radio show, Bildt fanned the flames by dismissing the statement as “no big deal” and the 80 co-sponsors as “not really serious states”, even going so far as to label the humanitarian arguments in favour of nuclear disarmament as a “side-track” that “no serious states engage in”.

Bildt’s “Fixation”

This might come as a surprise to the supporters of the statement, which, in addition to Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Austria and Switzerland, encompassed almost all of Latin America, including Brazil and Mexico, and a majority of African states.

The humanitarian approach has also been supported by such organizations as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), the United Nations Development Program (UNDP), the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs of the UN (OCHA), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, who all emphasized the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons at a government conference in Oslo in March.

Bildt’s apparent fixation on the “serious states” and the “serious approaches” to nuclear disarmament are indicative of his complicity in the stale approach to disarmament in which non-nuclear-armed states are sidelined and forced to wait and hope while the nuclear weapons agenda is fumbled over by the nuclear-armed states and their cohort.

The Ground Is Shifting

What is perhaps not clear to Mr Bildt, but is to those who had their ear to the ground at the NPT PrepCom and have been watching the nuclear weapons debate over the last year, is that the ground is shifting.

The widespread support for the joint statement reveals that more and more states are realizing that a different approach, in which non-nuclear armed states take the lead to propel the agenda towards a ban and the elimination of nuclear weapons, is urgently needed and is indeed gaining momentum.

Eighty Countries Signed the Humanitarian Initiative

The list of the 80 countries who signed the Humanitarian Initiative: Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Belarus, Bangladesh, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Cyprus, Cuba, Denmark, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Ghana, Georgia, Grenada, Guatemala, and Holy See.

The other signatories are Honduras, Iceland, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Jamaica, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Maldives, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Serbia, Samoa, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Swaziland, Switzerland, Tanzania, Thailand, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, Uruguay, Yemen, Zambia and South Africa.

*Source: International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). Go to Original.

Read also:

“There Are No Small Mistakes With Nuclear Weapons”

Civil Society Resolved to Ban Nukes

Which Countries Have Nuclear Weapons and How Many?

Banks, Pension Funds, Insurance Companies in 30 Countries ‘Invest’ Your Money in Nuclear Arms

‘Humanity Could Not Survive a Nuclear War Using Even a Fraction of Existing Arsenals’

Another Lost Chance to Save Middle East from Mass Destruction

Middle East Nuclear Free Bid Moves to Finland – Yet Another Lost Chance?

Nuclear Free Middle East “High Priority”

Nuclear Free Middle East — Necessary Yet Impossible

Watch The Sky–It May Rain Atomic Bombs 

Nuclear Terrorism – Killing 100,000 People Not Very Difficult

Humanitarian Consequences of Nuclear Weapons — Are You Ready to Hit the Gas?

Ecocide, a Catastrophic Consequence of Nuclear Weapons

“Breaking the Nuclear Chain” Campaign

Pressure to Push the Nuclear Genie Back in the Bottle

Germany Resolved to Pave the Way to Nuclear Disarmament

India, Pakistan Engaged in World’s Most Active Nuclear Arms Race

World Nuclear Forces: ‘Fewer But Newer’ Weapons

Desert “Star Wars”, Respect Dignity of Life

Nuclear Dangers, The World Is “One Minute Closer to Midnight”

U.S. Spending on Atomic Bombs Doubles UN Budget

Of Dr. Strangelove and the Risk of Using Atomic Bombs

World Campain Against False ‘Nuclear Deterrence Doctrine’ 

The Story of Child Yami and the Atomic Bomb 

Obama and How to Save a Quarter of a Trillion Dollars

You Choose: $105 Billion a Year for Health Care or Nuclear Weapons?

The NPT’s “Unacceptable and Continuous Failure”: Egypt Walks Out

Fed Up With Empty Promises, The Arabs May Abandon Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

Middle East Nuclear Free Bid Moves to Finland – Yet Another Lost Chance?

2013 Human Wrongs Watch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: