Human Wrongs Watch
22 March 2015 (ICAN)* — The Norwegian Under Secretary of State, Bård Glad Pedersen, admitted on TV that Norway has been ‘demarcated‘ by the United States to not sign the pledge to fill the legal gap on nuclear weapons launched by Austria at the conclusion of the Third Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons.*
This revelation follows a recent story by Kyodo news exposing similar pressures directed towards Japan to prevent them from supporting the pledge.
According to the Japanese newspaper, a U.S. State Department official admitted that Washington will not back the pledge, citing the need to pursue “a more pragmatic approach that represents a consensus view” of the states parties to the NPT [Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty], demanding the same commitment from its allies.
This is a curious statement, which implies that article VI of the NPT does not take a pragmatic approach to nuclear disarmament.
The Austrian pledge is indeed a call to all states parties to the NPT to renew their commitment to the urgent and full implementation of existing obligations under Article VI, and to this end, identify and pursue effective measures to fill the legal gap for the prohibition and elimination of nuclear weapons.
Liv Tørres, General Secretary of Norwegian People’s Aid, denounced this pressure on Norway as inappropriate.
“Norway launched an initiative whose main focus is disarmament, and it managed to transform the way we think about nuclear weapons. It is insolent that the US is now demanding that Norway withdraws from the initiative that it helped start.”
The government has also been criticized by the three opposition parties who recently put forward an initiative that demands that the Norwegian government support the pledge and carry on playing a key role in the process to prohibit and eliminate nuclear weapons.
“This is a clear sign that the nuclear weapon states are getting more and more nervous about the growing appetite for a prohibition of nuclear weapons. They did the same with the processes that led to the adoption of the Mine Ban Treaty and the Convention on Cluster Munitions,” said Beatrice Fihn, Executive Director of ICAN.
“It’s time for the non-nuclear weapon states to decide if nuclear weapons must be declared illegal and be put on the same footing of other weapons of mass destruction”.
To date [18 March 2015], 55 states associated themselves with the pledge, considering it to be an opportunity to open a much-needed discussion on Article VI.
While the US is pressuring its allies into inaction, it offers not serious alternative to implement the NPT’s disarmament obligation.
The so-called “pragmatic” approach seems not to carry any coherent vision for the future, while seeking to block any initiative that amounts to at concrete commitments on disarmament.
*Source: International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). Go to Original.
Related ICAN reports:
- Which countries have nuclear weapons and how many?→
- What are their effects on health and the environment?→
- Who supports a global ban on nuclear weapons?→
- What are the most significant events of the nuclear age?→
Read more on Human Wrongs Watch:
Tell Your Bank Not to Invest in Nuclear Weapons!
Initiative on Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons Takes Centre Stage at UN General Assembly
‘The Damage Caused by Past Nuclear Testing Cannot Be Reversed’
Nuclear — Despite Price Dip, Uranium Demand, Production Continue to Rise
UN Officials Call for Renewed Global Commitment to Ending Nuclear Tests
Do You Have the Courage to Ban Nuclear Weapons?
Why Is the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons So Urgent?
Hiroshima: The Myth of “Military Necessity”
Inhumane, Illegal, Immoral and Cruel: a Survivor Account of the Hiroshima Bombing
Anti-Nukes Move from Norway to Bahrain The NPT’s “Unacceptable and Continuous Failure”: Egypt Walks Out
Fed Up With Empty Promises, The Arab May Abandon Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty
Middle East Nuclear Free Bid Moves to Finland – Yet Another Lost Chance?
Nuclear Free Middle East “High Priority” Nuclear Free Middle East — Necessary Yet Impossible
Middle East — France’s Fuzzy Face on Nuclear Abolition
‘Strong UN Commitment’ to Nuclear-free Middle East Conference
Which Countries Have Nuclear Weapons and How Many?
Banks, Pension Funds, Insurance Companies in 30 Countries ‘Invest’ Your Money in Nuclear Arms
‘Humanity Could Not Survive a Nuclear War Using Even a Fraction of Existing Arsenals’
Another Lost Chance to Save Middle East from Mass Destruction
Watch The Sky–It May Rain Atomic Bombs
Nuclear Terrorism – Killing 100,000 People Not Very Difficult
Humanitarian Consequences of Nuclear Weapons — Are You Ready to Hit the Gas?
Ecocide, a Catastrophic Consequence of Nuclear Weapons
“Breaking the Nuclear Chain” Campaign
Pressure to Push the Nuclear Genie Back in the Bottle
Germany Resolved to Pave the Way to Nuclear Disarmament
India, Pakistan Engaged in World’s Most Active Nuclear Arms Race
World Nuclear Forces: ‘Fewer But Newer’ Weapons
Desert “Star Wars”, Respect Dignity of Life
Nuclear Dangers, The World Is “One Minute Closer to Midnight” U.S. Spending on Atomic Bombs Doubles UN Budget
Of Dr. Strangelove and the Risk of Using Atomic Bombs World Campain Against False ‘Nuclear Deterrence Doctrine’
The Story of Child Yami and the Atomic Bomb
Obama and How to Save a Quarter of a Trillion Dollars
You Choose: $105 Billion a Year for Health Care or Nuclear Weapons?
Will Israel Attack Iran … Really?
Top US Military Commander: ‘I Don’t Want to Be Complicit’ if Israel Attacks Iran
US Defense Secretary Warns of ‘Pearl Harbor’ Cyber Attack by Iran
Leave a comment